[Reprint] to return to the soul back to modern: essays free _ Xu Zhaobao

Original address: back to the soul back to modern: essays free author: Xu Zhaoshou back to the soul back to modern: prose �C prose modernity of be free dialogue among Xu Zhaoshou (author of Fudan University doctor of literature) Yang YK (independent essayist) Xu Zhaoshou: prose, we are talking about is really too small. Vassal of prose fiction, poetry, and has become a stingy and not become something, covered for its own reasons. Some people say that first appeared in poetry. Aristotle, Heidegger have such meaning at least, China today has a lot of literary theory, also think so. It is believed that poetry is the highest of all stylistic language, even the highest realm of fiction. Such an understanding is not wrong in itself, but the problem is, it's just wishful thinking that, and to pursue it as the first of the very existence of. Can even be said, as ideal a reality. One thing is clear, the text before the already have language that is spoken. Speaking are not poetry, on the contrary, it is prose. Appearance of the text, make the language into another. Prose was turned back. Therefore, Chinese first are referred to as the prose and poetry in all the different text. Life and the beauty of the text itself, it is the rhythm. With rhyming text can be called poetry, blank verse text into prose. This point, both at home and abroad. More recently, novel separation from prose, a separate Hill, and fiction become its subsidiary. Essays are also voluntarily turned back. So, when people talk about literature, novels and poetry are talking about. Modernity has always been does not refer to prose. However, in fact, in modern times, poetry in prose around in order to seek formal emancipation, fiction is also to become more like prose, and strive to achieve beautiful text. If we look at a novel is, in fact it is a beautiful combination of numerous essays. From this point, novel just essays, or it is prose. For example, Proust's remembrance of the water year is novel? answer Yes. But we definitely know that it is in prose fiction, or more accurately, it is fiction prose. Isn't it? was take a look at qianbaibian about in James Joyce's Ulysses queer writing without punctuation, it isn't prose? take a look at Romain �� Roland yuehan��kelisi Erich leinsdorf and let men be absorbed, and the first, is not a great prose yet?, talked so much, I would like to talk about is the prose is blanked. Should reproduce the discover prose. Rediscover the prose style of liberation. As described earlier in these novels will benefit from this. China Vanguard literature of the last century 80 's also benefited from this. ������ô��������⣿�������������ַ���ɢ�ġ���ɢ��ȷʵ��Ҫ���֣�����ɢ�����IJ�������ȱ�����֡� The discovery of the soul, soul found. Good words are found in our mind, good text cannot be separated from the discovery of the soul. Past our old accusing certain works from seriously out of life so seriously out of life, and want me to say, our greatest disease is not enough "from life". We also mentioned above in the past life, can't out of life, your life will never be higher than. I think it really should be accused is out of mind. Certainly there are some things we as far as the eye can reach, something definitely is not our vision. Prose to express is not as far as the eye can reach, our vision is not all that, but as our souls, our hearts are not all that, is again returned to prose of one of the most helpless, repeatedly to return to live life. Essays is that we really should go back to the soul. �����٣���һ�������ǣ�ɢ����С˵�Ĺ�ϵ�� In fact earlier talked about, and now I have to say is that prose can to write like a novel. People have been watching their boundaries. Seem to be limits are important. For example, the prose story like a novel, it was considered prose, it ceases to be ourselves. But if the novel to write like the prose, it is still at it. Prose are included in fiction, prose, but cannot contain novel. Indeed, fiction may include poetry, and poetry cannot contain novel. This is a theoretical misleading. Literature and in real life, many of the limits of such limits, as absurd and true, and difficult to change. ��������ɢ�ġ�С˵��ʫ�裬����ͬһĸ��ġ� Who would like to how how to chant, as long as he has the ability to clearly. Xu Zhaoshou: now I would like to take your prose to talk about the prose fiction. Whether it is classical prose, is also known as modern prose essays, they all share a common characteristic, poetry and fiction of the client, so it is provided as a present: in relation to the poetry, it is no rhyming of article; relative to the novel, it is a small space, or notHave a story, or does not determine the character, or zhishuxiongyi (prose poem), or shape, or direct-hit site (now talk about a new prose), and so on. But the fact is that such a limit has been broken. Now is precisely the pursuit of the poems in blank verse, however, that argument just resemblance, real poetry in the pursuit of a rhythm of the language itself, is nothing but internal rhythms. From that point of saying, with a source of poetry and prose, the complex has attributed to another source. Which said limits of fiction and essays is absurd. Small space can be mininovel. The Kong Yiji, Lu Xun, is considered to be novel, but it is not prose. Maybe all these limits cannot truly be novels and essays. One thing seems certain, it's fiction. Fiction by modern literary theory are said to be novel and important features. Novel if it has lost a fiction, it's hard to reach the inner truth. But the real prose is required. But the problem is that fiction and it is characteristic of some excellent prose. Like Lu Xun, of the grass, not inside is a record of a fictitious life? jiamiu the myth of Sisyphus, not fictitious? however, is, unfortunately, most essay writers cannot this fiction. Recently, I saw brother Yongkang prose, not casually reveal such fictional approach, but intentionally try to this imaginary mode. This was a bold experiment. Do not know what are the causes of initially? Yang YK: essays, novels, poetry, this is the same mother, you can't say which is the prose, that's where poetry, which is novel. Prose, including fiction and poetry path is narrower, problem in General on this. I want to say is that the essay seeks to achieve the ultimate objective is certainly not fiction, is not true. I have always been enough distance from fiction. I have awareness and fictional maintain sufficient distance, because in the eyes of writers or critics only a fiction, fiction fiction. I want to say that is the essence of literature is not life of evidence-based, speak with precision as from exact information, but evidence-based, or speak with precision as from exact information of "fiction". Literary fiction's most reasonable and unreasonable fiction who are not literary category. Plato has played a prominent example, with three beds, beds of the first one is really, built by the creator. Second bed is a piece of wood from woodworking hand. Third bed is the artist making beds. God never must not be created between two or more beds, for God does not want to be that kind of manufacturing of a specific bed Carpenter. Manufacturing a particular bed can only be a Carpenter. So we can call limner bed producers. So are we going to call limner for creators and producers of the bed or something? Plato was put it this way: I think the most appropriate address is what other people are making things imitator, reason was painted something always actual and limner isolation levels far indeed. In short in Plato's eyes, poet, painter, writer of tragedies hands will never be able to have a "real thing", "God never must not be created between two or more beds, for God does not want to be that kind of manufacturing of a specific bed Carpenter". Writer at this point is similar to how God. I've been to a certain distance from real, literature and our life is completely different, is two things, rather than a thing. The problem is that very few of us do this, we're mixing the two together, or things in the literature as a living thing. A simple example, you can't find a experienced hardships in life go to propagation of HAL best hairdresser training course, the best massage therapist training courses, it is best to remove corns training courses, best body odor removal of course, the best driver's training course, the best fitness clubs, the best chef in training doctors sth Life you absolutely cannot find a pigs driving carriage, in Kafka's work will be able to find a coach. Literary charm will be here. Good writers should be done, that is "real" maintain adequate vigilance and distance, and awareness and fictional maintain sufficient distance. Xu Zhaoshou: for some time before I write an article, is dedicated to literary truth. Good luck with the article, I list the truthfulness of literature in different stages of historical topics, as well as the depth and breadth of expression. Involves a question in the Middle, that is real life and art of real-world problems. Good writers are not entirely realistic, this is not to do, however, in the heart of some writers, is real and the real distances. Writers should pursue this realm. Naturalism and realism: the more I want to be true, it is farther and real. Is exactly what you want to keep your distance. Your works are revealed in this pursuit. Yang YK: writers do not confirm the authenticity of any life or not truth, but found that kind of life, or comedy or tragedy, or in an agony of significance, not meaning. Roland Barthes said writing was a confusing reality, there is no doubt that on the one hand, its authors and their social contacts, on the other hand, writing in a tragic turn. I think you should also include a comic reversal, including "unreal" reversing the reversal, fragmentation, and the reversal of all that shocking experience. The same is true of the Metamorphoses of Kafka is both the identity of the samusa beetles long confirmation and for the purpose of identity verification to reverse, or comedy or tragedy caused by, or in an agony of significance. The outsider, Camus, too, works finally reached the goal is to make the hero looks more like an outsider, but also to confirm, or comedy or tragedy brought about by outside, or in an agony of significance. Xu Zhaoshou: it seems to me that you're trying to do in these essays is that break the boundaries of essays and novels. A city you want to in prose fiction, fiction a lot of people. This has to do with traditional prose has a distance so that those harsh theorist, you are deviant, and went into the scope of the novel. But it is interesting to you does not recognize these, do you think you're still writing prose. This is a kind of transcendence. Maybe you do not recognize this, maybe you don't recognize. Therefore, the nextEssay or novel problem will no longer be talking about the problem, but some issues to discuss literature. In fact, in my mind, your prose is novel. This limit is gone, so I called it literature. From this height when your prose, some meaningful things worth talking about. For example, you're in a-Marquez, Gabriel Garcia, or was in many Western modernist-style writing this unreal cities, write the absurdity of the characters in the city. Tragedy or comedy. In an agony of. This is very interesting. Yang YK: I want to say is that fiction includes you "break the boundaries of prose and novels", "prose fiction in the way of a city, fiction a lot of people," and so on, and cannot solve the current problems encountered by the prose. I'm going to do only one thing, that is, by "Unreal City" found "modern life" means, or find a "modern life" lurk, or comedy or tragedy, or in an agony of significance, including myths you mentioned. Absurdity is meaningful, such as Samuel Beckett's waiting for Godot, regardless of what is Godot, waiting for meaningful or meaningless waiting has been recognized in the process. I see someone in the animated discussion of essays, literature, tragedy, comedy, and in fact in an agony of, add up to a literary character of a nearly complete. Xu Zhaoshou: it seems to me that your essay is different from the traditional prose fiction and absurdity, which, in fact, exactly what is the true characteristic of modern prose. I cold one has talked about, people despise resulted in prose the prose to trace only those tables exists. However, if we broke the shackles, prose will be free. Just like your prose, so that I've seen of modern prose you want. In fact, I have said, in the modernist novel, these essays already exist, and now should be someone that they promote, makes the prose regain weather, prose can arrive also exist. So, in my essay for you that illusion city more interesting. Yang YK: my recent works have indeed occurred in an unreal city propagation, HAL appears accurately described as a "Unreal City" of modern life. Here I emphasize "Illusion City" of modern life and are not illusory. It is filled with "rubbish, dust, kitchen knife, there were occasional strange dogs from barking, late night open Calla, electric saw. There is putting on. Putting on their birthday suits. Pretend to embrace. Pretend to moan. Putting passion. Pretend to flush. Pretend to touch. Pretend to be a fruit knife and tear. Pretend to be a strange night, raped. There is also a glass barrier face. A woman on the phone, and hoarseness. Keep your hands off me. Put your dirty hands off. Calla opened. Scarlet heels down on the glass, launching on the ground. Very fine pantyhose, very thick legs. Mum here do not want to take advantage of any. Automated teller machine idle, customer notice of illegible handwriting. Terminal failures, suspension of service. A clenched fist. A not see red car license plate. Water droplets, mist, person hiding inside the car. A deformation of the metal box flies up, after a few fall, collided with a giant iron, desolation and crisp sound. Kitchen knife on the fall. "What dogs and wolves, don't insult my personality", Markham, naked in the street and catch up with a client. Was a bright cold fruit knife in his hand. "(The spring of iron), there is a curse, curse of the real. There are warm. "It is only a fragment, with heavy rains," certainty ". Xu Zhaoshou: when it comes to modern prose, we may immediately think of Western modernism, to depict the modern myths and daily breaking, fast strokes, Freehand. But I'm going to tell you is not. These things we have writers in China to imitate. Here I still have a low profile, that is, man Ocean. I think our Chinese writers can explore an Oriental-style modernism, or exploring the Western fusion of modernism. We should look for the experience. Yang YK: I wanted to, assertions China which day will appears what what sent, and is you says of "Oriental type of modernist", or "exploration a West integrated of modernist" no significance, I concern of is I says of that tragedy of, and comedy of, and sad Hi cross of one day is will deep penetration to we each personal soul in the, as long as I says of that tragedy of, and comedy of, and sad Hi cross of one day deep penetration to we each personal soul in the, total one day we everyone will like Benjamin eye in the of Baudelaire as, panic to "just station in traditional social and modern social of crossroads Shang", 19th century medium-term traditional social and modern social of crossroads. I think that's when China first the modernists, the first true urban poet, the first true urban essayist. It would be a very important, very important in modern Chinese literature node. Back to the soul back to modern, prose will be freedom and new possibilities. (Note: one last question, my brother and Yongkang is perceived to have a bias, I think it's just very well, which is our next laid a foreshadowing of the discussion. It seems to me that Western philosophers, thinkers, and even an anthropologist, seldom looking East, particularly China. Although there are a number of philosophers reading Laozi, learned of Confucius, as Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, etc, but they are just fur. Hegel's dismissive of Chinese culture. Jaspers had done this effort, understanding of Laozi and ConfuciusAttained a certain height, but remained in the West's logic and knowledge levels. Experience and wisdom of China had still not been acknowledged in the West. Similarly, the Chinese experience and wisdom of art in modern China have not been respected. This is the proposition that we encountered today. ��